Machine Intelligence Strategies for Sustainable Commerce and Banking: Minimizing Eco-Funding Uncertainty through Forecasting Techniques
Keywords:
Machine Intelligence, Sustainable Banking, Eco-Funding Uncertainty, Non-Performing LoansAbstract
The increasing convergence of machine intelligence, sustainable commerce, and banking systems has redefined how financial institutions evaluate risk, allocate capital, and manage eco-funding uncertainty. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-driven financial models require robust forecasting mechanisms capable of integrating macroeconomic volatility, banking sector fragility, and sustainability constraints. Non-performing loans (NPLs), macroeconomic instability, and policy uncertainty continue to threaten banking stability, especially in emerging and developing economies where financial systems are highly sensitive to external shocks (Ghosh, 2017; Syed & Aidyngul, 2020).
This research explores advanced machine intelligence strategies designed to enhance predictive accuracy in sustainable banking and commerce ecosystems. The study focuses on how forecasting techniques, including machine learning-driven risk modeling and macro-financial predictive analytics, can minimize eco-funding uncertainty by improving the detection of non-performing assets and optimizing green capital allocation. Prior literature demonstrates that macroeconomic determinants such as GDP fluctuations, inflation, governance quality, and credit cycles significantly influence NPL dynamics across banking systems (Mishra et al., 2021; Koju et al., 2018).
The paper develops an integrated conceptual framework that combines macroeconomic forecasting models, bank-specific risk indicators, and machine intelligence-based prediction systems to strengthen financial decision-making in environmentally sensitive investment environments. It further examines how intelligent systems can enhance financial stability by identifying early warning signals in credit markets, improving risk classification, and reducing uncertainty in sustainable investment portfolios.
The findings suggest that machine intelligence significantly enhances forecasting precision in banking systems, particularly in predicting non-performing loans and mitigating systemic risk under macroeconomic volatility (Ahmed et al., 2021; Foglia, 2022). Furthermore, integration of predictive analytics in financial governance improves eco-funding efficiency and strengthens sustainability-aligned investment strategies.
This study contributes to the emerging discourse on AI-driven sustainable finance by presenting a unified analytical perspective that connects macro-financial stability, machine intelligence, and eco-funding optimization. The framework emphasizes proactive financial governance supported by predictive systems, aligning with recent advancements in AI-based circular financial risk mitigation (Mirza et al., 2026).
References
1. A. A. Syed and Y. Aidyngul, “Macro economical and bank-specific vulnerabilities of nonperforming loans: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries,” J. Public Aff., Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1002/pa.2414.
2. A. Ghosh, “Sector-specific analysis of non-performing loans in the US banking system and their macroeconomic impact,” J. Econ. Bus., vol. 93, pp. 29–45, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2017.06.002.
3. A. K. Mishra, S. Jain, M. Abid, and M. R L, “Macro-economic determinants of non-performing assets in the Indian banking system: A panel data analysis,” Int. J. Finance Econ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 3819–3834, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1002/ijfe.1989.
4. A. S. Alharbi, G. Halikias, M. Rajarajan, and M. Yamin, “A review of effectiveness of Saudi E-government data security management,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 573–579, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s41870–021-00611-3.
5. A. S. Prasetyo, “Peran Ketidak pastian Kebijakan Ekonomi dan Resiko Geopolitik Amerika Serikat Terhadap Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan,” Sketsa Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 56–71, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.yudharta.ac.id/v2/index.php/SKETSABISNIS/index https://jurnal.yudharta.ac.id/v2/index.php/SKETSABISNIS
6. A. Syed and R. Tripathi, “Nonperforming Loans in BRICS Nations: Determinants and Macroeconomic Impact,” SSRN Electron. J., 2020, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3528097.
7. A. Zaib, F. Farid, and M. K. Khan, “Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in the Banking Sector in Pakistan,” Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 53–81, May 2014.
8. B. P. Bhattarai, “Assessing Banks Internal and Macroeconomic Factors as Determinants of Non- Performing Loans: Evidence from Nepalese Commercial Banks,” Int. J. Account. Finance Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–32, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.462811ijafr.v3i1.28.
9. F. Fkih, D. Rhouma, and H. Alghofaily, “A semantic approach for sarcasm identification for preventing fake news spreading on social networks,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41870–024-02156-7.
10. H. H. Abdelbaki, “Macroeconomic determinants of non-performing loans in GCC economies: does the global financial crisis matter,” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 433, 2019, doi: 10.1504/IJEBR.2019.099973.
11. I. T. Idris and S. Nayan, “The moderating role of loan monitoring on the relationship between macroeconomic variables and non-performing loans in association of Southeast Asian nations countries,” Int. J. Econ. Finane, Issues, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 402–408, 2016.
12. I. Szarowska, “Effect of macroeconomic determinants on non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries,” Int. J. Monet. Econ. Finance, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 20, 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJMEF.2018.090564.
13. J. Lee, K. Chen, I. Chang, and C. Chen, “Determinants of non-performing loans, firm's corporate governance and macroeconomic factors,” Int. J. Finance Econ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 88–98, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2139.
14. K. Gabeshi, “The impact of macroeconomic and bank specific factors on Albanian non-performing loans,” Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2017.
15. K. N. Konstantakis, P. G. Michaelides, and A. T. Vouldis, “Non performing loans (NPLs) in a crisis economy: Long-run equilibrium analysis with a real time VEC model for Greece (2001–2015),” Phys. Stat. Mech. Its Appl., vol. 451, pp. 149–161, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.163.
16. K. Koju, R. Koju, and S. Wang, “Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans: Evidence from Nepalese Banking System,” J. Cent. Bank. Theory Pract., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 111–138, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.2478/jcbtp-2018–0026.
17. Kure, E., M. Adigun, and D. Okedigba, “Non-Performing Loans in Nigerian Banks: Determinants and Macroeconomic Consequences,” Cent. Bank Niger. Econ. Financ. Rev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–24, 2017.
18. L. Memdani, “Macroeconomic and Bank Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) in the Indian Banking Sector,” Stud. Bus. Econ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–135, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1515/sbe-2017–0026.
19. L. P. A. K. Rahayu, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Risiko Gagal Bayar Pada Koefisien Respon Laba,” E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 665–684, 2015.
20. M. Ahmed, M. Majeed, E. Thalassinos, and Y. Thalassinos, “The Impact of Bank Specific and Macro-Economic Factors on Non-Performing Loans in the Banking Sector: Evidence from an Emerging Economy,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 217, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/jrfm14050217.
21. M. Foglia, “Non-Performing Loans and Macroeconomics Factors: The Italian Case,” Risks, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 21, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/risks10010021.
22. M. Petkovski, J. Kjosevski, and K. Jovanovski, “Macro and bank specific determinants of nonperforming loans in polish commercial banks,” Argum. Oeconomica, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 107–126, 2021, doi: 10.15611/aoe.2021.2.06.
23. M. T, et al “IoT based Smart Robotic Design for Identifying Human Presence in Disaster Environments Using Intelligent Sensors,” (AUTOCOM), Dehradun, India, 2024, pp. 399–403, doi: 10.1109/AUTOCOM60220.2024.10486106.
24. N. Arham, M. S. Salisi, R. U. Mohammed, and J. Tuyon, “Impact of macroeconomic cyclical indicators and country governance on bank non-performing loans in Emerging Asia,” Eurasian Econ. Rev., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 707–726, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40822–020-00156-z.
25. P. Sahoo et al., “Artificial Deep Neural Network in Hybrid PV System for Controlling the Power Management,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2022, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/9353470.
26. P. S. Ranjit, et.al., Direct utilization of straight vegetable oil (SVO) from SchleicheraOleosa (SO) in a diesel engine - a feasibility assessment, International Journal of Ambient Energy, DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2022.2068063.
27. P.S. Ranjit, V. Chintala, “Direct utilization of preheated deep fried oil in an indirect injection compression Ignition engine with waste heat recovery framework. Energy, 242, 122910, 2022. Elsevier (SCI), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122910
28. S. Ahmed, M. Majeed, E. Thalassinos, and Y. Thalassinos, “The Impact of Bank Specific and Macro-Economic Factors on Non-Performing Loans in the Banking Sector: Evidence from an Emerging Economy,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 217, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/jrfm14050217.
29. S. Goyal, J. M. Prosad, N. Mishra, and N. Singhal, “Non-performing Assets and Institutional Quality Indicators: Evidence from Developing Countries,” Vis. J. Bus. Perspect., p. 097226292211458, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1177/09722629221145805.
30. S. M. Rahaman and D. Sur, “Identifying Key Drivers of Non-Performing Assets in Indian Public Sector Banks: A Panel Data Analysis,” IIM Kozhikode Soc. Manag. Rev., p. 227797522110001, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1177/22779752211000146.
