Affective Coping Strength; Community Wellbeing Adaptation Structures Older Adult South Asian Subcontinent Survey-Based Examination
Keywords:
Affective coping, emotional regulation, older adults, South AsiaAbstract
Affective coping strength is a central determinant of how older adults regulate emotional experiences while adapting to social and environmental changes in later life. In the South Asian subcontinent, where demographic aging is accelerating alongside persistent socioeconomic transitions, community wellbeing structures play a critical role in shaping adaptive emotional and psychological responses. This study examines the relationship between affective coping mechanisms and community-based adaptation patterns among older adult populations through a survey-informed analytical synthesis grounded in established emotion and adaptation theories. The conceptual framework integrates affective science perspectives on emotional regulation and hedonic adaptation with socio-behavioral models of resilience and community integration.
The study draws upon foundational theories of emotion and adaptation, including appraisal-based emotion frameworks and hedonic adjustment mechanisms, to interpret how older adults evaluate and respond to stressors in social environments (Smith & Lazarus, 1990; Ellsworth & Scherer, 2003; Frederick & Loewenstein, 2003). Additionally, computational and systemic models of emotional processing are considered to understand structural patterns of coping behavior in complex social systems (Gratch & Marsella, 2004; Marinier & Laird, 2004). Empirical grounding is supported by contemporary findings on psychological resilience and psychosocial adaptation in aging populations within India, highlighting the role of stress resistance and community integration in emotional stability (Agarwal, Usha Rani, & V, 2023).
Findings suggest that affective coping strength in older adults is strongly influenced by three interconnected domains: emotional appraisal flexibility, social belongingness structures, and perceived community support continuity. Variations in coping efficacy are observed across differing community contexts, with stronger adaptive outcomes associated with sustained social engagement and reduced emotional forecasting bias. Hedonic adaptation processes further demonstrate that emotional recovery from stressors is partially mediated by cognitive reinterpretation and social reinforcement mechanisms.
The study contributes to gerontological psychology and socio-emotional systems research by offering an integrated perspective on affective coping and community adaptation structures. It highlights the necessity of embedding emotional resilience frameworks within community-level aging policies to enhance psychosocial wellbeing outcomes in South Asian contexts.
References
1. Agarwal, R., Usha Rani, B., & V, S. . (2023). RESILIENCE TO STRESS AND PSYCOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENTS AMONG ELDERS IN INDIA: a DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(05), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.48047/ecb/2023.12.si5.051
2. Butler-Henderson, K., and J. Crawford, “A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity,” Computers and Education, vol. 159, 2020.
3. M. Cabanac, “Physiological Role of Pleasure ”, Science, vol. 173, no. 4002, pp. 1103–1107, Sept. 1971.
4. L. Elsalem, N. Al-Azzam, A. A. Jum’ah, and N. Obeidat, “Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students’ preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 62, pp. 326–333, 2021.
5. N.H. Frijda, Laws of Emotion. Erlbaum, 2007.
6. S. Frederick and G. Loewenstein, “Hedonic Adaptation ”, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, Eds., pp. 302–329, Russell Sage Foundation, 2003.
7. D.T. Gilbert, E. Driver-Linn, and T.D. Wilson, “The Trouble with Vronsky: Impact Bias in the Forecasting of Future Affective States ”, The Wisdom in Feeling: Psychological Processes in Emotional Intelligence, L.F. Barrett and P. Salovey, Eds., pp. 114–143, Guilford Press, 2002.
8. J. Gratch and S. Marsella, “A Domain-Independent Framework for Modeling Emotion ”, Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 269–306, 2004.
9. P.M.P.S. Haththotuwa, and R.A.H.M Rupasinghe, “Adapting to Online Learning in Higher Education System during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Universities in Sri Lanka,” Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 1, 2021.
10. R. Marinier and J. Laird, “Toward a Comprehensive Computational Model of Emotions and Feelings ”, in Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf Cognitive Modeling, pp. 172–177, 2004.
11. A.W. Muzaffar, M. Tahir, M. W. Anwar, Q. Chaudry, S. R. Mir, and Y. Rasheed, “A Systematic Review of Online Exams Solutions in E-Learning: Techniques, Tools, and Global Adoption,” IEEE ACCESS, vol. 9, pp. 32689 - 32712, 2021.
12. A. Parducci, Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications. Erlbaum, 1995.
13. P. Rozin, “Preadaptation and the Puzzles and Properties of Pleasure ”, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, Eds., pp. 109–133, Russell Sage Foundation, 2003.
14. C.A. Smith and R.S. Lazarus, “Emotion and Adaptation ”, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, L.A. Pervin, Ed., pp. 609–637, Guilford Press, 1990.
15. P.C. Ellsworth and K.R. Scherer, “Appraisal Processes in Emotion ”, Handbook of Affective Sciences, R.J. Davidson and K.R. Scherer, Eds., pp. 572–595, Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.
